Real Or Obvious Info Op? Intelligence Officer Sam Shoemate Releases Info On Shawn Ryan Show

You Decide...

UPDATE: Veteran journalist Lara Logan has responded to today's Shawn Ryan events...

Shawn Ryan interviewed retired U.S. Army intelligence officer Sam Shoemate today regarding a manifesto sent to Shoemate by Matthew Livelsberger, the reported Tesla truck bomber.

The email received by Shoemate is below.

Below that email text is the interview.

Below that is analysis by Matt Tardio, former SF, which seems thoughtful on its face.

Is it real? Or is it an op to promote a narrative? Should we trust anything the FBI says at this point?

You decide.

@CollinRugg
BREAKING: Shawn Ryan says he is going into hiding following the release of his most recent episode where he shares an email allegedly sent by Matthew Livelsberger before the Trump hotel explosion. Guest Sam Shoemate says he was sent an email on Tuesday from Livelsberger before the explosion, saying the drones over NJ were operating by the use of a "gravitic propulsion system." Only the US and China have this capability, according to the email. "On December 31st, Sam received an email allegedly from Matthew Livelsberger - who would be named as the perpetrator in the detonation of a Tesla Cybertruck at Trump Tower the following day," Ryan said on YouTube. Here is what the email said, according to

@samosaur: "In case I do not make it to my decision point or on to the Mexico border I am sending this now. Please do not release this until 1JAN and keep my identity private until then. First off I am not under duress or hostile influence or control. My first car was a 2006 Black Ford Mustang V6 for verification. What we have been seeing with "drones" is the operational use of gravitic propulsion systems powered aircraft by most recently China in the east coast, but throughout history, the US. Only we and China have this capability. Our OPEN location for this activity in the box is below. China has been launching them from the Atlantic from submarines for years, but this activity recently has picked up. As of now, it is just a show of force and they are using it similar to how they used the balloon for sigint and isr, which are also part of the integrated coms system. There are dozens of those balloons in the air at any given time. The so what is because of the speed and stealth of these unmanned AC, they are the most dangerous threat to national security that has ever existed. They basically have an unlimited payload capacity and can park it over the WH if they wanted. It's checkmate. USG needs to give the history of this, how we are employing it and weaponizing it, how China is employing them and what the way forward is. China is poised to attack anywhere in the east coast I've been followed for over a week now from likely homeland or FBI, and they are looking to move on me and are unlikely going to let me cross into Mexico, but won't because they know I am armed and I have a massive VBIED. I've been trying to maintain a very visible profile and have kept my phone and they are definitely digitally tracking me. I have knowledge of this program and also war crimes that were covered up during airstrikes in Nimruz province Afghanistan in 2019 by the admin, DoD, DEA and CIA. I conducted targeting for these strikes of over 125 buildings (65 were struck because of CIVCAS) that killed hundreds of civilians in a single day. USFORA continued strikes after spotting civilians on initial ISR, it was supposed to take 6 minutes and scramble all aircraft in CENTCOM. The UN basically called these war crimes, but the administration made them disappear. I was part of that cover-up with USFORA and Agent [Redacted] of the DEA. So I don't know if my abduction attempt is related to either. I worked with GEN Millers 10 staff on this as well as the response to Bala Murghab. AOB-S Commander at the time. [Redacted] can validate this. You need to elevate this to the media so we avoid a world war because this is a mutually assured destruction situation. For vetting my Linkedin is Matt Berg or Matthew Livelsberger, an active duty 18Z out of 1-10 my profile is public. I have an active TSSCI with UAP USAP access."

Below is the interview by Matt Tardio.

@samosaur told @ShawnRyan762 the person who contacted him went through great detail to hide thier IP address by using encrypted communications like signal, VPN's, and ProtonMail. Yet, a name is given and he provides "bona fides" that can be located with public records. So to be clear, they wanted

@samosaur to get the message and believe it was Matt, but not be able to trace where it was sent from. There is several indicators that this author is not who they say they are. The email references "USFORA" several times. This refers to US Forces Afghanistan. Green Beret teams (ODA's) fell under SOTF-A, or Special Operations Task Force Afghanistan. Here we see an issue. Someone who understands the language, but is missing the minor details. Additionally, USFOR-A was HIGHLY known for denying airstrikes if ANY civilians were present. Even under Trump with a different set of ROE's while fighting ISIS-K, civilian casualties were a major concern for SOTF-A; USFOR-A would have crapped their pants. "6 minutes" to scramble "all aircraft in CENTCOM" is laughable. Especially for someone with his experience. CENTCOM stretches across Iran, Iraq, Syria, etc. This is frankly absurd. I can confirm that Matt was in Southern Afghanistan that year, however I believe the Province to be incorrect. I'm waiting on confirmation. After speaking with several people familiar with Matt and his experience with drones, we can confidently say he was a novice and had just started his career in that field. For him to have an understanding of new propulsion technology is also unbelievable. I was also assured he did not have access to that information. Image 1 Screen shot of someone pretending to be a Green Beret associated with Livelsberger in December of 2024. Notice the lack or an "s" on "swamp" and "mountain". Rangers will refer to it as swamp phase, mountains, or mountain phase. This person has a good understanding of the English language, but the colloquial understanding does not exist. So the question is, if not him. Who and why?