• Obama and Biden - The True Manchurian Presidents

    September 1, 2023
    Views: 4554

    Barack Obama: The Real-Life Manchurian Candidate?

    Jamie Glazov's new book on Obama delivers some startling and disturbing – surprises. I was pleasantly surprised. Glazov, the editor, assigned subject matter experts to review Obama’s policy decisions as president, focusing on foreign policy. This strategy provides a depth of reporting not found in other assessments of the Obama presidency, my own included.

    It’s unlikely that future Obama historians will know more about the Muslim Brotherhood than Robert Spencer, more about communism than Trevor Loudon, more about Benghazi than Clair Lopez, more about Israel than Daniel Greenfield or Dov Lipman, or more about Russia than J.R. Nyquist, to name a few.

    The opening chapter by John Drew sets the tone for what follows. Drew first met the future president when Obama was a student at Occidental College in Los Angeles.

    The Obama Drew meets is a closeted homosexual, uncloseted anti-colonialist, and wannabe communist revolutionary. “There’s going to be a revolution,” Drew remembers Obama saying. “We need to be organized and grow the movement.”

    The President Obama we meet in future chapters is more discreet. Yet, his policies suggest that the young man Drew met never changed his outlook on communism or revolutionary Islam. I do the book an injustice by summarizing each chapter, so let me focus on the one I found most intriguing, “Obama’s Russia Collusion” by J.R. Nyquist.

    Nyquist begins with a question most Obama biographers have chosen to overlook – why were Obama’s mother and his presumed father taking a Russian class? This is the University of Hawaii class where they reportedly first met.

    The year was 1960. The Cold War was at its peak. The Soviet Union was our avowed enemy. As Nyquist points out, the Kenyan Barack Obama was an African socialist, the mom, Ann Dunham, was a cultural Marxist.

    Both openly disdained capitalism and tolerated America only for the perks. “Perhaps they were learning Russian because their ideals aligned with those of the ‘socialist motherland’?” Nyquist asks.

    Perhaps, too, Obama was groomed from the beginning to fulfill the pro-Soviet ambitions of his parents. If so, the choice of CPUSA member and possible KGB agent Frank Marshall Davis to be Obama’s mentor was part of the plan.

    Nyquist analyzes President Obama’s seemingly schizophrenic Russia policy through the eyes of an Islam-friendly socialist who was possibly “the secret creature of the Russian communists.” This admittedly sounds like the stuff of a Le Carré novel, but Nyquist relates a story that, if true, adds considerable credence to his theory. In 2010, Nyquist recorded an interview with American physicist Tom Fife, who lived and worked in Russia in the 1990s. As Fife told the story, he was at a party hosted during that decade by a Russian physicist and his wife, “an apparatchik of some sort within the Communist Party.”

    The wife, who had been drinking, explained that America would soon have a black president who had been “groomed” to be just that.

    “She said he had a white mother and a black African father,” Fife continued. “She thought this was great because then he wouldn’t have any slave baggage to accompany it.” According to Fife, the woman said his name was “Barack,” which was Arabic for blessing, and “he’ll be a blessing for our world efforts; a blessing for world communism.”

    The idea that Obama has been groomed by a communist-Islamist alliance is not as fanciful as it sounds. In 1979, Vernon Jarrett, a widely syndicated black columnist then with the Chicago Tribune, reported on a conversation with attorney Khalid Al-Mansour.

    By the way, Jarrett was the father-in-law of intimate Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett. As a young reporter and fellow traveler in Chicago, Jarrett had as a mentor Frank Marshall Davis—small world. According to Jarrett, al-Mansour had encouraged Arab leaders to take a more active role in black America. This effort would include “giving financial help to disadvantaged students.” For the record, 1979 was the year Obama began his studies at the pricy Occidental College.

    In March 2008, al-Mansour made the news once again. During an interview on a NY1 show “Inside City Hall,” venerable black New York politico Percy Sutton matter-of-factly told host Dominic Carter how he first became aware of Barack Obama.

    Sutton said he had been “introduced to [Obama] by a friend.” Sutton described the friend, Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, as “the principal adviser to one of the world’s richest men.” Sutton was referring here to Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal. Reportedly, al-Mansour asked that Sutton “please write a letter in support of [Obama] … a young man that has applied to Harvard.” The well-connected Sutton obliged him, and the rest is history.

    In my 2020 book, “Unmasking Obama,” I tell the story of the media’s desperate – but successful – effort to kill the Percy Sutton story before the 2008 election. The fact that Al-Waleed bin Talal and al-Mansour were both overt anti-Semites would not have played well in the campaign's final weeks.

    Future historians would do well to ignore the reporting of the legacy media altogether. For those interested in the real story, “Barack Obama’s True Legacy” would be a better place to start.1

    The Treasonous Manchurian President

    Joe Biden

    By Ed Haugland and Paul Vallely

    Per US Code, Title 18, Section 2381. Treason is defined as:

    Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

    Locked in my garage!

    Biden stated the “documents were in the garage, locked with my corvette.” First, let us state that several people are now behind bars, in prison, and convicted of lesser infractions. The question is NOT whether Trump and Biden will be treated the same – these are two different cases. And we’ve seen the progressives bend backward to state the exact opposite about Biden’s case – noting it was an “accident.” The hypocrisy of Senator Mark Warner, Congressman Sheila Jackson Lee, Adam Schiff, and many others is so thick – it shocks all senses from reality.

    When questioned by reporters about not asking anything more about the documents “based on my lawyers’ advice,” Biden's statement is alarming. The fact that he is having his “lawyers” search for classified documents is even more disturbing. The question is why Biden’s lawyers were searching for classified or other documents.? Why were the documents there (two locations, are there more)? How did they get there? Who took them from the White House? What subject did they pertain to? It begs the apparent eight-hundred-pound gorilla-type question – what is he trying to cover up? Many more come to mind. He’s concerned about the…” laptop?”

    When this story broke, I thought I heard screams of panic from the 50-plus hypocrite 50-plus IC executives who told us the laptop was Russian disinformation. LMAO! One can assume they’re working on a letter stating top-secret SCI information isn’t sensitive. Sure!

    If any intelligence or another public or private sector professional used the above wording as an excuse – they would be tried for espionage, gross negligence, and several other crimes, convicted, and in jail. And so, there are several such people now in prison.

    The first batch of classified documents was found at his center, partly funded by Communist China1. Then a day later, whoa! Another batch of classified documents was found near his corvette in garage 2. Let us put this in context. Most of this was known before the 2022 November election. Yet, no leaks from the leakiest bureaucracy the DOJ/FBI? Hmmm. More election interference? Likely, but let us stay focused. This occurs while he uses the national security establishment as a weapon against us, the people3.

    The national security establishment states the damage caused the loss of Top-Secret information “could cause exceptionally grave damage to national security.” It also states that such classified material “Must be under the positive control by an authorized person or stored in a locked security container/GSA safe, vault, secure room, or secure area.”

    50 Years Plus of Experience

    Biden’s known this for over 50 years!!! No excuses. None. Given the lack of positive control, a damage assessment will / must be conducted to assess the impacts of the potential loss of this information – given it “could cause exceptionally grave damage to national security.” I believe Biden should be held accountable to foot the cost for this assessment.

    The Big Guy & 10% - Reporting and Other Requirements

    As we look at Biden’s role as the “big guy,” getting 10% of fees from foreign business dealings, we must consider – why, what for, and to what extent. Is he compromised? As we see from reporting on his son Hunter’s laptop, that information points to several deals with China, Russia, and Ukraine. Given the press reporting, did Hunter (and the Big Guy), who engaged with various foreign organizations, adhere to all mandatory reporting requirements? These organizations, I would suggest, all fell under federal reporting requirements and laws per US Code Title 18.4

    1-21 https://www.theepochtimes.com/classified-documents-found-at-penn-biden-center-presidents- lawyer_4972626.html


    3 https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/jan/11/aclu-calls-crackdown-fbi-use-intel-community- spy-a/

    4 https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter115&edition=prelim

    An organization is "subject to foreign control" if:

    it solicits or accepts financial contributions, loans, or support of any kind, directly or indirectly, from, or is affiliated directly or indirectly with a foreign government or a political subdivision thereof, or an agent, agency, or instrumentality of a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, or a political party in a foreign country, or an international political organization.


    its policies, or any of them, are determined by or at the suggestion of, or in collaboration with, a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, or an agent, agency, or instrumentality of a foreign government or a political subdivision thereof, or a political party in a foreign country, or an international political organization.

    (B)(1) The following organizations shall be required to register with the Attorney General:

    Every organization subject to foreign control engages in political activity.

    Every organization engages both in civilian-military activity and in political activity.

    Every organization subject to foreign control which engages in civilian- military activity; and

    Every organization, the purpose or aim of which, or one of the purposes or aims of which, is the establishment, control, conduct, seizure, or overthrow of a government or subdivision thereof using force, violence, military measures, or threats of any one or more of the foregoing. Every such organization shall register by filing with the Attorney General, on such forms and in such detail as the Attorney General may by rules and regulations prescribe, a registration statement containing the information and documents specified in subsection (B)(3) and shall within thirty days after the expiration of each period of six months succeeding the filing of such registration statement, file with the Attorney General, on such forms and in such detail as the Attorney General may by rules and regulations prescribe, a supplemental statement containing such information and documents as may be necessary to make the information and documents previously filed under this section accurate and current to such preceding six months' period. All the organization's officers shall subscribe to every statement required to be filed by this section, under oath.

    For those unfamiliar, there is a slew of mandatory training regarding the handling and protecting classified documents. Security training on insider threats, those seeking to harm the United States, notes 13 guidelines to determine one’s eligibility to hold a clearance. Given Hunter’s laptop, and Biden’s possible involvement, I’ve highlighted several areas I would have grave concerns in granting Biden a clearance.

    Clearance eligibility determinations - Uses whole person concept and the 13 Adjudicative Guidelines

    •Allegiance to the U.S.

    •Foreign influence

    •Foreign preference

    •Sexual behavior

    •Personal conduct

    Financial considerations

    Alcohol consumption

    Drug Involvement

    Psychological conditions

    Criminal Conduct

    Handling protected information

    •Outside activities

    •Use of information technology systems

    As noted, a slew of foreign reporting requirements remains to hold clearances. Again, based on what we’ve heard of Hunter’s laptop, I’ve highlighted several areas of grave concern regarding Biden and his reporting. He may have reported his contacts with Hunter and these suspicious businesses. I do not know. But now we must, did he, to whom, about what/whom, and when? Was his reporting in full, or did he leave out information (now that we have the laptop)? We must also note that Biden’s son was involved with several foreign organizations.

    Foreign contacts

    •Continuous contact with foreign nationals includes:


    •Kinship or Marriage

    Financial Obligation

    Suspicious contacts with or by foreign nationals

    • Member of immediate family or spouse’s immediate family is a citizen of a foreign country

    There are also several executive orders and federal laws that address this issue. As “the” executive of the USA, he should know them. Hello! He has had 50 years of training. A few include:

    Executive Order 13526 -Classified National Security Information

    Executive Order 12968 -Access to Classified Information

    Intelligence Community Directives (ICD)

    Security Executive Agent Directives (SEAD)

    Criminal and/or Treasonous?

    There are standards for accessing, controlling, storing, removing, and destroying classified materials. The existence of Top Secret Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) in an unprotected university funded in part by Communist Chinese is very concerning. Then there was the second set in Biden’s garage “locked” with his corvette. Americans must also note that these documents were in his possession – while he was NOT Vice President. He was – like you and I – a citizen. These are major security violations, likely criminal at a minimum and treasonous. There is no way around his negligence. Just look at the latter references.

    50 Years! After fifty-plus years of dealing with classified information, we see Biden’s disregard for protecting and dealing with such sensitive information. He is responsible. His lack of strict adherence to security protocols is gross negligence illegal and at minimum, complicit in criminal conduct and in violation of several laws. He should resign, then be charged and prosecuted.

    Treason: What does Article 3 Section 3 of the Constitution mean?

    Three key elements are necessary for an offense to constitute treason: an obligation of allegiance to the legal order and intent and action to violate that obligation. Treason is a breach of allegiance and of the faithful support a citizen owes to the sovereignty within which he lives. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act or on Confession in open Court.

    What are the two ways to commit treason?

    Treason against the United States shall consist only of levying war against them or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or confession in open court. The most severe form of treason is high treason - crimes committed with the intent to put the Nation, or parts thereof, under foreign rule or influence.

    I have written about the potential of Biden being compromised prior. I stand by my opinion and assessment that he’s not only compromised but that he is, in fact, the “Manchurian President.5 At a minimum, Biden’s abrogated his oath of office and should be impeached, removed from office, and barred from public service. We now have more than the two witnesses required to accuse Biden of treason. It is time for Congress to step up and fulfill its Constitutional duty and place Biden on trial for treason.

    Released and Distributed by the Stand Up America US Foundation


    Contact: [email protected]

    1. Jamie Glazov September 1, 2023


    Major General Paul Vallely (USA, Ret)

    Paul E. Vallely is a retired U.S. Army major general and senior military analyst. He served in the Vietnam War and retired in 1993 as deputy commanding general, Pacific Command. In 2004.
    Notify of
    1 Comment
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    Is "Russia" really the enemy we need to heed? I believe it's larger than that.

    © Copyright 2024 - Armed Forces Press - All Rights Reserved